Analysis of Pongracic's Handball Incident in Fiorentina v Inter: A Detailed Breakdown of the VAR Decision
Delve into the intricacies of the controversial handball incident involving Pongracic during the Fiorentina v Inter match. Mauro Tonolini provides insightful commentary on the referee's decision and the VAR assessment. Find out why the incident was deemed non-penalty despite the protests from Inter.
?_a=BAMAMihKA)
An analysis of Pongracic’s handball at the Franchi stadium during the final match of the 30th round of Serie A.Mauro Tonolini, a member of the National Referees’ Committee (CAN), is in the DAZN studios on *Open VAR* to analyse the incidents from the latest round of Serie A fixtures.The final incident analysed is the unpunished handball by Pongracic in the Fiorentina v Inter match (referee Colombo and VAR team comprising Maresca and Massa) following a cross from the right flank by the Nerazzurri, who subsequently protested at the failure to award a penalty.Referee: “No, no, no, it bounces and he’s on top of it. No, no, no.”VAR: “Show me the point of contact straight away. Yes, he’s trying to clear it. I agree, Fabio, I agree with you. Let’s watch it at normal speed… In my view, it’s not a penalty. It’s an unexpected ball, it’s bouncing, the dynamics told me it wasn’t a penalty. Let’s look at the dynamics… Can you see he’s trying to clear it? Based on the dynamics, no, it’s not a penalty. However, it’s very close to the body. Check complete, it’s just as you saw it, Andrea, well done.”Referee: “Okay, thanks.”VAR: “The arm is relaxed and very close to the body; the ball then bounces once it’s touched the ground and he tries to clear it. I agree with you.”Tonolini comments on the incident as follows: “An absolutely correct decision; a sound assessment by Colombo on the pitch, who was in an excellent position and judged the incident appropriately. The ball bounced in front of Pongracic, who tried to play it, and the contact with his arm occurred in a natural and consistent manner with the movement. It was a non-penalty situation; Colombo’s decision was correct and was subsequently upheld by the VAR room. In terms of position and movement, the arm is not punishable. The fact that there is an opponent there is irrelevant. Assessments of whether handball is punishable are made independently of the outcome of the subsequent play. The fact that there was an opponent behind him changes nothing.”All the latest updates in real time! Join the CALCIOMERCATO.COM WhatsApp channel: click hereAdd GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting
Introduction
In the final match of the 30th round of Serie A between Fiorentina and Inter, a crucial handball incident involving Pongracic sparked controversy and debate. Mauro Tonolini, a member of the National Referees’ Committee, offered his expert analysis on the incident during the Open VAR segment on DAZN.
Referee and VAR Assessment
Referee Colombo and the VAR team, comprising Maresca and Massa, reviewed the incident following a cross from Inter. Despite protests from the Nerazzurri for a penalty, the decision on the field stood. The VAR analysis focused on the point of contact, the player's intent, and the dynamics of the situation.
Detailed VAR Review
The VAR team observed that Pongracic's arm was in a relaxed position and close to his body when the ball bounced unexpectedly. It was determined that the player's attempt to clear the ball was natural, and the contact with his arm was not deemed a deliberate handball. The decision to not award a penalty was based on the assessment of the dynamics and the player's movement.
Tonolini's Expert Opinion
Mauro Tonolini commended Referee Colombo for his accurate judgment and positioning during the incident. He endorsed the VAR decision, emphasizing that the contact with Pongracic's arm was inadvertent and not punishable. Tonolini stressed that the presence of an opponent behind the player did not influence the assessment of the handball incident.
Conclusion
The analysis of Pongracic's handball incident in the Fiorentina v Inter match highlights the meticulous nature of VAR assessments and the importance of understanding the dynamics and intent behind player actions. The expert commentary from Mauro Tonolini sheds light on the rationale behind the decision to uphold the non-penalty verdict.
